Business
Model in Tourism / How Web Engineering fits in each model / is there a
difference between knowing the path and walking the path (examples and personal
experiences)?
This summer
I have been working at my Web Engineering skills. One of the most gratifying things
of returning to Touristology after working at Web Engineering is to feel that you are a genius, basically
because I have clearer frameworks (by
the way, I have the same feeling when I change from English to Catalan or
Spanish!!!).
But I
strongly believe that Touristology, Web Engineering and English make a good
combination, even though some of my students think otherwise. Can we work It Out?
I want to
put together Business Models and Technological Schemes and try to forecast the
future of the tourism sector. As the Beatles say “Only time will tell if I am right or I am wrong”
So, here I’m trying to put
together Touristology and Web Engineering!
This summer in Catalonia (and in
the rest of the world!) it had been a strong argument about the necessity to
change the business model of some tourist destinations. Exactly what do they
refer when they said that? Sometimes I believe that they don’t know what a
business model mean but they use this expression because sounds right (I
believe that because I have been listening the same for the last 20 years!!!).
Basically, we have just two
Business Models in Tourism:
1) Mass Tourism: Price and economy of scale orientated. Demand looking for the
cheaper price. Supply and intermediaries focus on maximize revenues by
increasing the number of tourist.
2) Specialize Tourism: Add value
oriented. Demand willing to pay the right price in order to get what is
important to them. This can be related to the travel or something that they get
through the travel (experience, international contacts, new perspective, new
segments, new markets, the feeling that your friends are not define anymore by
geographical boundaries BUT for similar or complementary interest/hobbies/taste
…). Supply focus on maximize the profit, both for increasing the price and for
increasing the margin thanks to control the chain of value (topics already
discuss in this blog). Intermediaries also specialized following long-tail and
pro-am theories.
All the rest of sometimes called
Tourism models are in reality typologies of Tourism (cultural, scientific,
ecotourism, MICE….). Which will be Mass or Specialize depending on the rules
define above. It isn’t Specialize better of Mass or the other way around. They
are just two clear different business model!
How web engineering fits in these
two models?
Do you think that Google and
Facebook are an important component of you chain of value?
It depends on the Business
Model!!! Surely they are important for mass tourism BUT they are merely
complementary in the specialize one. In Specialize tourism is far more
important that you develop YOUR Google (A place where your customers, your
employees and members of the chain of value find everything they will need) and
YOUR Facebook (A place to share, to find, to build…).
Who does have to think the whole application? A Touristologist or a Web
Engineerer? Do you think that a Touristologist must know the technological
scheme or he can leave all this topics to the engineers?
Do you believe that www.travelmuse.com or www.tripit.com will
revolutionize the tourism sector?
Are they focus on Mass or Specialize tourism? Can we develop something
better? Must we combine Touristology with Web Engineering?
My motto had always been knowing
the path and walking the path. So, in the next posts I will try to combine
interesting examples with personal experiences. It will be difficult and time
consuming BUT IT WILL BE FUN!!!
I hope you like it and if you want to comment
or ask anything … Make yourself at home! At the end of the day this is not MY
blog it’s OUR blog. The blog of the ones that believe that Touristology is a
science!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment